Administration Asks Appeals Court for Stay on Indefinite Detention Ban, Triggers Constitutional Showdown by CHRIS HEDGES, TRUTHDIG
Administration Asks Appeals Court for Stay on Indefinite Detention Ban, Triggers Constitutional Showdown
Monday, 17 September 2012 10:30 By Chris Hedges, Truthdig | News Analysis
In January I sued President Barack Obama over Section 1021(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which authorized the military to detain U.S. citizens indefinitely, strip them of due process and hold them in military facilities, including offshore penal colonies. Last week, round one in the battle to strike down the onerous provision, one that saw me joined by six other plaintiffs including Noam Chomsky and Daniel Ellsberg, ended in an unqualified victory for the public. U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest, who accepted every one of our challenges to the law, made her temporary injunction of the section permanent. In short, she declared the law unconstitutional.
Almost immediately after Judge Forrest ruled, the Obama administration challenged the decision. Government prosecutors called the opinion “unprecedented” and said that “the government has compelling arguments that it should be reversed.” The government added that it was an “extraordinary injunction of worldwide scope.” Government lawyers asked late Friday for an immediate stay of Forrest’s ban on the use of the military in domestic policing and on the empowering of the government to strip U.S. citizens of due process. The request for a stay was an attempt by the government to get the judge, pending appeal to a higher court, to grant it the right to continue to use the law. Forrest swiftly rejected the stay, setting in motion a fast-paced appeal to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and possibly, if her ruling is upheld there, to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Justice Department sent a letter to Forrest and the 2nd Circuit late Friday night informing them that at 9 a.m. Monday the Obama administration would ask the 2nd Circuit for an emergency stay that would lift Forrest’s injunction. This would allow Obama to continue to operate with indefinite detention authority until a formal appeal was heard. The government’s decision has triggered a constitutional showdown between the president and the judiciary.
“This may be the most significant constitutional standoff since the Pentagon Papers case,” said Carl Mayer, co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs.
“The administration of President Obama within the last 48 hours has decided to engage in an all-out campaign to block and overturn an order of a federal judge,” said co-lead counsel Bruce Afran. “As Judge Forrest noted in her opinion, nothing is more fundamental in American law than the possibility that journalists, activists and citizens could lose their liberty, potentially forever, and the Obama administration has now lined up squarely with the most conservative elements of the Republican Party to undermine Americans’ civil liberties.”
The request by the government to keep the law on the books during the appeal process raises a disturbing question. If the administration is this anxious to restore this section of the NDAA, is it because the Obama government has already used it? Or does it have plans to use the section in the immediate future?
“A Department of Homeland Security bulletin was issued Friday claiming that the riots [in the Middle East] are likely to come to the U.S. and saying that DHS is looking for the Islamic leaders of these likely riots,” Afran said. “It is my view that this is why the government wants to reopen the NDAA—so it has a tool to round up would-be Islamic protesters before they can launch any protest, violent or otherwise. Right now there are no legal tools to arrest would-be protesters. The NDAA would give the government such power. Since the request to vacate the injunction only comes about on the day of the riots, and following the DHS bulletin, it seems to me that the two are connected. The government wants to reopen the NDAA injunction so that they can use it to block protests.”
The decision to vigorously fight Forrest’s ruling is a further example of the Obama White House’s steady and relentless assault against civil liberties, an assault that is more severe than that carried out by George W. Bush. Obama has refused to restore habeas corpus. He supports the FISA Amendment Act, which retroactively makes legal what under our Constitution has traditionally been illegal—warrantless wire tapping, eavesdropping and monitoring directed against U.S. citizens. He has used the Espionage Act six times against whistle-blowers who have exposed government crimes, including war crimes, to the public. He interprets the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force Act as giving him the authority to assassinate U.S. citizens, as he did the cleric Anwar al-Awlaki. And now he wants the right to use the armed forces to throw U.S. citizens into military prisons, where they will have no right to a trial and no defined length of detention.
Liberal apologists for Barack Obama should read Judge Forrest’s 112-page ruling. It is a chilling explication and denunciation of the massive erosion of the separation of powers. It courageously challenges the overreach of Congress and the executive branch in stripping Americans of some of our most cherished constitutional rights.
In the last 220 years there have been only about 135 judicial rulings that have struck down an act of Congress. Most of the cases involved abortion or pornography. Very few dealt with wartime powers and the separation of powers, or what Forrest in her opinion called “a question of defining an individual’s core liberties.”
Section 1021(b)(2) authorizes the military to detain any U.S. citizen who “substantially supported” al-Qaida, the Taliban or “associated forces” and then hold them in military compounds until “the end of hostilities.” The vagueness of the language, and the refusal to exempt journalists, means that those of us who as part of our reporting have direct contact with individuals or groups deemed to be part of a terrorist network can find ourselves seized and detained under the provision.
“The Government was unable to offer definitions for the phrases ‘substantially support’ or ‘directly support,’ ” the judge wrote. “In particular, when the Court asked for one example of what ‘substantially support’ means, the Government stated, ‘I’m not in a position to give one specific example.’ When asked about the phrase ‘directly support,’ the Government stated, ‘I have not thought through exactly and we have not come to a position on ‘direct support’ and what that means.’ In its pre-trial memoranda, the Government also did not provide any definitional examples for those terms.”
The judge’s ruling asked whether a news article deemed by authorities as favorable to the Taliban could be interpreted as having “substantially supported” the Taliban.
“How about a YouTube video?” she went on. “Where is the line between what the government would consider ‘journalistic reporting’ and ‘propaganda?’ Who will make such determinations? Will there be an office established to read articles, watch videos, and evaluate speeches in order to make judgments along a spectrum of where the support is ‘modest’ or ‘substantial?’ “
Forrest concurred with the plaintiffs that the statute violated our free speech rights and due-process guarantees. She noted that “the Court repeatedly asked the Government whether those particular past activities could subject plaintiffs to indefinite detention; the Government refused to answer.” The judge went on to criticize the nebulous language of the law, chastising the government because it “did not provide particular definitions.” She wrote that “the statute’s vagueness falls far short of what due process requires.”
Although government lawyers argued during the trial that the law represented no change from prior legislation, they now assert that blocking it imperils the nation’s security. It is one of numerous contradictions in the government’s case, many of which were illuminated in Forrest’s opinion. The government, she wrote, “argues that no future administration could interpret § 1021(b)(2) or the AUMF differently because the two are so clearly the same. That frankly makes no sense, particularly in light of the Government’s inability at the March and August hearings to define certain terms in—or the scope of—§ 1021(b)(2).” The judge said that “Section 1021 appears to be a legislative attempt at an ex post facto ‘fix’: to provide the President (in 2012) with broader detention authority than was provided in the AUMF [Authorization to Use Military Force Act] in 2001 and to try and ratify past detentions which may have occurred under an overly-broad interpretation of the AUMF.”
The government, in effect, is attempting to push though a law similar to the legislation that permitted the government to intern 110,000 Japanese-Americans during World War II. This law, if it comes back into force, would facilitate the mass internment of Muslim Americans as well as those deemed to “support” groups or activities defined as terrorist by the state. Calling the 1944 ruling “an embarrassment,” Forrest referred to Korematsu v. United States, which upheld the government’s internment of Japanese-Americans.
The judge said in her opinion that the government “did not submit any evidence in support of its positions. It did not call a single witness, submit a single declaration, or offer a single document at any point during these proceedings.” She went on to write that she found “the testimony of each plaintiff credible.”
“At the March hearing, the Court asked whether Hedges’ activities could subject him to detention under § 1021; the Government stated that it was not prepared to address that question. When asked a similar question at the August hearing, five months later, the Government remained unwilling to state whether any of plaintiffs’ (including Hedges’s) protected First Amendment future activities could subject him or her to detention under § 1021. This Court finds that Hedges has a reasonable fear of detention pursuant to § 1021(b)(2).”
The government has now lost four times in a litigation that has gone on almost nine months. It lost the preliminary injunction in May. It lost a motion for reconsideration shortly thereafter. It lost the permanent injunction. It lost its request last week for a stay. We won’t stop fighting this, but it is deeply disturbing that the Obama administration, rather than protecting our civil liberties and democracy, insists on further eroding them by expanding the power of the military to seize U.S. citizens and control our streets.
- Obama Appeals NDAA, Indefinite Detention Ban. Media Ignores it. (libertycrier.com)
- Americans already detained under NDAA? (alethonews.wordpress.com)
- Americans Already Detained Under NDAA? (alexanderhiggins.com)
- Americans already detained under NDAA? (rt.com)
- Obama fights for indefinite detention (salon.com)
- Administration Asks Appeals Court for Stay on Indefinite Detention Ban, Triggers Constitutional Showdown (lissakr11humanelife.wordpress.com)
- Federal Government Not Willing To Rethink NDAA (personalliberty.com)
- White House demands military prisons for Americans under NDAA (EndtheLie.com)
- We Won – For Now (truthdig.com)
September 29, 2012 - Posted by duckyack | Here And Now | Barack Obama, Forrest, George W. Bush, National Defense Authorization Act, NDAA, Obama, Obama administration, Supreme Court of the United States
No comments yet.
Website under construction
Just Me, Administrator
Where We Stand
This is a Conservative political blog. The Administrator writes under MY TWO SENSE, and all other posts are either re-postings from online news articles and/or commentaries. Readers may comment on any subject as long as the comment is without hate and unacceptable language. Any post, in part or in full, as long as permission is obtained from the original author, may be copied and pasted, and sourced with website link and author. Nothing from this website may be used for commercial or personal gain. Any post under MY TWO SENSE can be reposted as long as it is not for commercial gain, clearly dispays the source link, and sites the author. We believe the above rules fall under the Fair Use Act rules and regulations.
Administrator is retired, cherishes privacy, is a Constitutional Conservative, anti-Obama, DC corruption, and people without the courage to stand up and speak out against the myriad injustices perpetrated by the Obama administration. Administrator's montra; Stand Up and Speak Out about injustices, child abuse, and Constitutional high crimes and treason.
Administrator has very little tolerance for those who will not defend their country against unConstitutional actions taken by the government. And the Administrator has no tolerence for those who are "too busy" with family and job to get involved. We are at war with government corruption at the highest degree in our history, and we are at war with Islam. Both are out to destroy America, and this Administration has done most of the dismantling of our infrastructure, and now, it is helping Muslim extremists murder American citizens without due process, probable cause, and without representation from an attorney. Pick your side, and jump into the fray.
Blogs I Follow
- April 2014 (1)
- March 2014 (7)
- December 2013 (6)
- November 2013 (22)
- October 2013 (8)
- September 2013 (12)
- August 2013 (27)
- July 2013 (33)
- June 2013 (24)
- May 2013 (78)
- April 2013 (64)
- March 2013 (20)
- February 2013 (9)
- January 2013 (30)
- December 2012 (51)
- November 2012 (53)
- October 2012 (115)
- September 2012 (62)
- August 2012 (47)
- July 2012 (24)
- June 2012 (30)
- GOSNELL, THE SERIAL KILLER OF CENTURIES; Grand Jury Estimate He Murdered Thousands Of Viable Infants April 8, 2014GOSNELL SERIAL KILLER Also please give $1 to help get the TV movie made. Just Me and My Two SenseFiled under: Home Tagged: Abortion, black, Gosnell, Kermit Gosnell, live births, minority, scissors, serial killer, spinal cordsduckyack
- THE UNANIMOUS DECLARATION of the thirteen united STATES of AMERICA or THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE and ITS RELEVANCE TODAY March 29, 2014When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the […]duckyack
- WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE IN AMAC AND AARP? MY TWO SENSE: Taken from the AMAC website homepage. And just to get it out of the way—no, I am not receiving anything from AMAC! In fact, I may be breaking some copyright infringement rule! But when I see honesty out there where so much is dishonest, I have to say something. From what I know about AMAC, all of what you see on this post is true. March 27, 2014What’s the difference between AMAC and AARP? The Constitution … They think it’s out of date. We think it is the greatest document ever devised by man for the governance of man. Big Government… They are for more government. We think there is too much government and wasted spending. Social Security… They are scaring older […]duckyack
- MY TWO SENSE: WHAT’S THAT YOU SAY? I CAN’T DISPLAY THIS CARTOON? March 26, 2014We Americans are like children. Tell us we cannot do something, and we will do that something just for spite! Freedom will not go quietly, obama! Americans have fought and given their lives for the sake of FREEDOM, and we will do it again, and again, and again. We will fight tyranny and oppression because […]duckyack
- THANKS TO ANJRPC’S TWEET MY TWO SENSE: GUN CONTROL KILLS! March 26, 2014Filed under: Here And Now Tagged: communist, Gun control, guns, Law, licensing, Nazi Germany, Obama, political, resolutions, Soviet Unionduckyack
- EMAIL FROM MCACC re: COMMON CORE SENATE HEARING March 25, 2014Senate Hearing on Common Core Wednesday March 26, 2014 2:30 p.m. Senate Lounge This week is our chance to be heard in the Senate. The Senate Education Committee will hold a hearing on two common core bills this week, SB514 introduced by Senator Lamping and SB798 introduced by Senator Emery. The Missouri Coalition Against Common […]duckyack
- ON TWITTER THANKS TO JANIE March 21, 2014PASS THIS ALONG WHILE WE STILL HAVE IT!!!!!!!!!! Filed under: Here And Nowduckyack
- EMAIL FROM TOWNHALL March 21, 2014AMAC – The Association of Mature American Citizens is now over 1,000,000 Members Strong! ObamaCare Deals Seniors Another Blow AMAC fought Obamacare before this law was passed Join AMAC! Take Back America! • Quarterly Magazine • Exclusive Discounts • Voice in Washington • Only $16 per Year! • And much more… On January […]duckyack
- THE BLAZE by CHARLES C. JOHNSON MY TWO SENSE: Disgraceful! This divisive president has caused, and continues to cause racial, religious, and raucous tensions in what was once a great nation. I say “was” because it’s the truth. As millions lay sleeping and apathetically dismissing criminal and highly unethical behaviors perpetrated by members of government in both high and low places, inside and out of the White House, America began to fall. The broad acceptance that “all politicians lie” and the ho-hum response to it was integral to a successful usurpation of a government of the People by the People, and for the People appeared to turn into a Fascist regime overnight. Under the thumb of an evil dictator we are sinking in a multiple “ism” quagmire much like that of a medieval sadistic monarch. Our once great, yet apathetic nation, laid out the red carpet for the Fascist dictator we now live under. Only a few saw the red flags and heard the alarms go off after 9-11-2001, when the then president Bush’s created the Patriot Act, which turned out to be a major flip-off in the face of our Constitutional Bill of Rights. Myriads fearful American citizens traded their freedom for illusion of security—theirs and mine! The Founders’ guarantee of liberty is now gone with the wind and so is the rest of what most people took for granted, such as an expectation of privacy—all that is gone. Asleep on the job Americans have no one to blame for the current hell in which we are, except themselves. Some of us really don’t deserve to be here. We’ve lost family and friends because of this administration’s snake oil hand jobs and con games that have divided us into two separate camps. I’ve never before seen the subject of politics in such rage and hatred. Atheism against Christianity debates are often passionate and emotionally excessive, but not to the same degree as the subject of Obama, his skin color and his agendas. They are continually brought to the front, forcing our attention on the wrong hand. Family members turn against each other, and friends stop speaking to one another. The difference in today’s culture of hate and that of the Civil War era must comparable. North vs. South—black vs. white—left vs. right, there is no longer any in between and no gray areas. And the truth is that as long as we remain divided, and the more negative and combative we are within our own circles, the more we do not notice what the one hand of our true enemy is up to. December 27, 2013Politics A Detailed Look at Obama’s Radical College Past…And We’re Not Talking About Barack Oct. 30, 2012 8:00am Charles C. Johnson This is a contribution by freelance writer Charles C. Johnson. Princeton, 1984. Michelle Obama attends and promotes a “Black Solidarity” event for guest lecturer Manning Marable, who was, according to Cornel West, probably “the […]duckyack
- WND December 6, 2013White House occupier tells one whopper after another! It’s getting to be a common characteristic of this so-called president. http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/white-house-caught-in-lie-about-obamas-past/Filed under: Home Tagged: White Houseduckyack
- White House caught in lie about Obama’s past December 6, 2013White House caught in lie about Obama’s past.Filed under: Homeduckyack
- White House caught in lie about Obama’s past December 6, 2013White House caught in lie about Obama’s past.Filed under: Homeduckyack
- CANADIAN FREE PRESS . . . BECAUSE WITHOUT AMERICA THERE IS NOT FREE WORLD by ARNOLD AHLERT December 3, 2013(Reprinted under Fair Use Act) http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/mobile/mobile-article/59617#.Up4P12wwsmY.twitter We gave thousands of guns to Mexican drug cartels. Americans died. Where is the outrage? Where Is the Outrage? By Arnold Ahlert Tuesday, December 3, 2013 On Sunday, the New York Post ran an excerpt from “The Unarmed Truth” by John Dodson. Dod […]duckyack
- THE TELLEGRAPH by COLIN FREEMAN (MY TWO SENSE: LOOK HOW FAR WE’VE COME. America is Germany all over again. JM) December 2, 2013Child taken from womb by social services Exclusive: Essex social services have obtained a court order against a woman that allowed her to be forcibly sedated and for her child to be taken from her womb by caesarean section By Colin Freeman 8:58PM GMT 30 Nov 2013 A pregnant woman has had her baby forcibly […]duckyack
- THE BLAZE by ERICA RITZ (MY TWO SENSE: Castration is appropriate here. JM) November 30, 201366-Year-Old Gay Rights Icon Arrested Over Horrific Child Porn Allegations (Graphic Content) Jun. 26, 2012 10:12am Erica Ritz (Photo via the SF Examiner) 66-year-old Larry Brinkin, the first man to use the phrase “domestic partner” in a lawsuit, was arrested in California Friday in connection with felony possession of child pornography, police said. The dist […]duckyack
- GOSNELL, THE SERIAL KILLER OF CENTURIES; Grand Jury Estimate He Murdered Thousands Of Viable Infants April 8, 2014