Conservative Political Views


By US Daily Review.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee leaders today sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asking why requests for more protection were denied to the U.S. mission in Libya by Washington officials prior to the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. The denials came after repeated attacks and security threats to U.S. personnel.

“Based on information provided to the Committee by individuals with direct knowledge of events in Libya, the attack that claimed the ambassador’s life was the latest in a long line of attacks on Western diplomats and officials in Libya in the months leading up to September 11, 2012. It was clearly never, as Administration officials once insisted, the result of a popular protest,” the committee’s chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and subcommittee chairman, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, write. “In addition, multiple U.S. federal government officials have confirmed to the Committee that, prior to the September 11 attack, the U.S. mission in Libya made repeated requests for increased security in Benghazi. The mission in Libya, however, was denied these resources by officials in Washington.”

The letter outlines 13 security threats over the six months prior to the attack.

“Put together, these events indicated a clear pattern of security threats that could only be reasonably interpreted to justify increased security for U.S. personnel and facilities in Benghazi,” the chairmen write.

The Committee has convened a hearing in Washington today on the security failures that preceded the attack.


Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb refused to use the word “terrorist” during her testimony to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Wednesday, saying she is not in the position to make “any judgments on my own.”


Attackers or Terrorists? State Dept. Security Chief: ‘I’m Not Making Any Judgments’

Charlene Lamb

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb testifies before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012 (AP Photo)

( – State Department Deputy Assistant Secretary of International Programs Charlene R. Lamb, who is responsible for safety and security at U.S. embassies and consulates around the world, used the word “attack” five times and “attackers” four times in her written testimony describing the 9/11 terrorist strike on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, but never used any derivative of the word “terror.”

When Rep. Dan Burton (R.-Ind.) asked why she did not call the terrorist attack “terrorism,” Lamb said: “I’m not making any judgments on my own.”

Lamb, as her State Department bio reads, is “responsible for the safety and security of over 285 overseas Embassies and Consulates and oversees the 550 special agent/security professionals posted at those locations.” (copy and paste link)

In written testimony submitted to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Lamb described the 9/11 terrorist hit on consulate in Benghazi as follows:

— “Additionally, I was in our Diplomatic Security Command Center monitoring multiple open lines with our agents for much of the attack.” (Emphasis added.)

— “The attack began at approximately 9:40 p.m. local time.”

— “Let me add here that over the course of the attack, two local Libyan security personnel were beaten, and two were shot.”

— “When the attack began ….”

— “Dozens of attackers then launched a full-scale assault that was unprecedented in its size and intensity.”

— “When they attempted to return to the main building, they encountered armed attackers and doubled back to Building B.”

— “The attackers used diesel fuel to set the main building ablaze.”

— “At the same time, attackers swept across the compound towards the Tactical Operations Center and Building B.”

At no time in her prepared testimony did Lamb ever refer to a terrorist act or terrorist attacker. She never described the perpetrators as terrorists.

Rep. Burton (R-Ind.) questioned her on her choice of language. “Today as I listen to people, and you, Ms. Lamb, have said you’ve described these attackers in a number of ways, but you don’t mention terrorist at all,” said Burton. “Why is that?

“The compound had been attacked once before and breached, and these people had all these weapons, projectiles, grenades, all kinds of weapons,” Burton continued. “Why would you call this anything but a terrorist attack? Why do you call them attackers?”

“Sir, I have just presented the facts as they come across,” Lamb said. “I am not making any judgments on my own.”

Lamb, as noted, called the events a “full-scale assault that was unprecedented in its size and intensity.”

For days following the attack, the White House said it was “spontaneous,” resulting from protests against an anti-Islamic YouTube video. On Sept. 21, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said it was “self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.”


October 10, 2012 - Posted by | Here And Now, Home, Must See, Political Corruption | , , , , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Political Vel Craft

Veil Of Politics

Political Film Blog

money, power, injustice, sex, violence, propaganda, anti-fascism...


Fighting Against Government Harassment

Constitutional Clayton

Politics surrounding the Constitution


Smile! You’re at the best site ever

John Groves Art Stuff

Art from johngrovesart


Swiss Defence League

the seaton post

A little bit of this and a little bit of that

Jericho777's Blog

Correcting Misinformation!

%d bloggers like this: