SO HERE AND NOW

Conservative Political Views

PATRIOTIC ACTION NETWORK (Anyone who wants the full document follow this link: http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/111/AAHCA09001xml.pdf)

Logo of the anti-RFID campaign by German priva...

Logo of the anti-RFID campaign by German privacy group FoeBuD. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Image of hand with implanted RFID chip, next t...

Image of hand with implanted RFID chip, next to RFID reader. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Just after the operation to insert the RFID ta...

Just after the operation to insert the RFID tag was completed. The yellow is from the iodine disinfection before inserting the chip. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Hand with planned insertion point for Verichip...

Hand with planned insertion point for Verichip device (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Another hidden secret in Obamacare “RFID Chip Implants”

(IS OBAMACARE’S MICROCHIPPING STILL GOING INTO OUR BODIES IN EARLY 2013?  JM)

And now we come to it. On Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed and signed into law the following Tuesday. Like I said before, there are a legion of horrible and just plain evil aspects to this bill and I’m sure you’ve heard a lot them by now. I don’t want to discount them but what cannot be missed here is this new law now opens a prophetic door on a magnitude not seen since the reformation of Israel.

This new law requires an RFID chip implanted in all of us. This chip will not only contain your personal information with tracking capability but it will also be linked to your bank account. And get this, Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip), reads, and I quote: “Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment”. It is now the law of the land that by March 23rd 2013 we will all be required to have an RFID chip underneath our skin and this chip will be link to our bank accounts as well as have our personal records and tracking capability built into it.

In just a minute I’m going to show you the black and white of the law itself and you can see it with your own eyes and wonder why an event of this magnitude which is nothing less than seismic in nature is met with little more than silence in the Christian community.

Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy? I’ll ask that question again in a minute and follow up on it, but now I want to show you the law itself. I’ve downloaded a PDF copy of HR3200 from the government’s website so what I’m about to show you is from the bill itself its nothing that I’ve written. You can access it all and see it all for yourself straight from the source itself.

H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1.
The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”

What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? As you saw earlier, it is the device approved by the FDA in 2004.

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuid…

A class II implantable device is an “implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.”

Going back to what we just looked at, the creation of the national medical device registry in section 2521, page 1002 line 5:

“In developing the registry, the secretary shall…”

And the law continues on with a laundry list of items that the secretary must do in the process of creating this registry. In this laundry list of items to do, Line 17, subparagraph B: “validating methods for analyzing patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and for linking such data with the information included in the registry as described in subparagraph (A)

Going back to subparagraph A [right above subparagraph B], it says: “including in the registry, in a manner consistent with subsection (f), appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier;”

Don’t be confused by the intentional obfuscation and skillful wording, This law first creates the national device registry and then immediately list all the task the secretary of health and human services will have do in the process of creating this registry.

The very first two items in the list mandates that the secretary first gives a unique identification to each of the items listed in paragraph 1 which is:

‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable.”

Then, the very next thing the secretary is to do is to create the process by which “patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources”, which is electronic medical records, that are linked to these newly and uniquely identified items from paragraph 1 which are the class III and class II implantable devices.

Class III devises are items such as breast implants, pacemakers, heart valves, etc. A Class II device that is implantable is, as you seen from the FDA, an implantable radio frequency transponder, RFID chip. From breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B which is, “for linking such data with the information included in the registry”? As we know from subsection A, the information in the registry is the name of a device. In plain speak, we are in a clear way being told that our electronic medical records are going to be linked to a class II implantable device!

Continuing a few lines down in this same section, section B subsection ii on still on page 1002, the “patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources”, that is to be linked is clearly spelled out as electronic medical records. It reads:  “link data obtained under clause (i) with information in the registry”. Information in the registry is, as we know from subparagraph A, the name of the device. So what is the data obtained under clause i? Back up a few lines to clause i

It reads: “obtain access to disparate sources of patient safety and outcomes data, including Federal health-related electronic data”. Again, from breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B? That stated purpose is “for linking such data” and the such data is electronic medical records.

What we already have already seen in just the creation of this registry, is the device that will serve as the link, which is an RFID microchip that is categorized as a Class II implantable device, as well as what it will be the link for which is your electronic medical records.

In case the law wasn’t clear enough on that point, still in the laundry list of things to do a few more lines down on the next page, page 1005

“The Secretary to protect the public health; shall establish procedures to permit linkage of information submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A, remember subparagraph A is the class 2 implantable device reference) with patient safety and outcomes data obtained under paragraph (3, which is electronic medical records); and to permit analyses of linked data;”

Continuing on to page 1007, in the STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA, AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA section, the secretary of health and human services is given full power to intact all mandates from the laundry list of to-do items in the creation process of the registry as well as dictate how the devises listed in the National Medical Device Registry are to be used and implemented.

“The Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting through the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, shall adopt standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device described in paragraph 1 (National Medical Device Registry), if such an identifier is required by section 519(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the device.”

 

Now on Page 503, section E Lines 13-17 and I quote: “encourage, as appropriate, the development and use of clinical registries and the development of clinical effectiveness research data networks from electronic health records, post marketing drug and medical device surveillance efforts“. Let me say that again, medical device surveillance efforts!

Now lets look at section 163 of HR3200, which gives the government a direct electronic access to your bank account which will work in conjunction with an implanted chip.

Page 58 Lines 5 through 15 reads:
(D) enable the real-time (or near real time) determination of an individual’s financial responsibility at the point of service and, to the extent possible, prior to service, including whether the individual is eligible for a specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card; (E) enable, where feasible, near real-time adjudication of claims

What does this mean? It means that the government will give everybody a health ID card that contains a machine readable device (magnetic strip or RFID chip) similar to a credit card. Embedded in this chip or strip is your Health Identification Number. When you visit a medical provider, the medical claims will be processed while you are still in the office. The medical providers will be paid in real time. The portion that you owe will be deducted from your bank account, in real time, according to HR 3200.

Notice here in this part which is at the beginning of 2000 plus pages of the law, it is carefully worded “which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card”. Here we are told that it may be a card. As you have already seen, deeper in the law [Sec. 2521 Pg. 1000] what this “may” utilize is clearly spelled out as a “class II device that is implantable”.

We can only speculate at this point why the law is set up this way. Most likely this section was written to account for the gap in time from when the process of chipping begins to when everyone has received a chip. A means of starting with a card for the sake of expedience while the process of chipping citizenry plays out. One thing is certain, the law mandates that within 3 years we will all have a chip under our skin that will serve this purpose.

Evidence of this logic is found in the deadline set for the start of the registry on page 1006.

“EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by paragraph (1), by not later than the date that is 36 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether or not final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been promulgated by such date.”

Also on page 259, this law requires the use of Electronic medical records system in all hospitals by 2012 which will leave a gap of at least a year before the class II implantable device is required.

Republican Congressman Ron Paul from Texas, states on his website:

Click here to open this page

“Buried deep within the over 1,000 pages of the massive US Health Care Bill (PDF) in a “non-discussed” section titled: Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521— National Medical Device Registry, and which states its purpose as…….. He quotes that part of the law and then goes on to say: “In “real world speak”, according to this report, this new law, when fully implemented, provides the framework for making the United States the first Nation in the World to require each and every one of its citizens to have implanted in them a radio-frequency identification microchip for the purpose of controlling who is, or isn’t, allowed medical care in their country”.

That is from a currently serving member of congress. Cutting through all the political ease, the bottom line is that eventually if you want to participate in a government healthcare plan you will have to have this chip implanted in you. This law mandates that you have to have insurance and by virtue of this law guarantees that all private healthcare insurers will be driven out of business with only the government option left. We will be in a single payer system and you will have to have an imbedded chip to be a member of this system and it is mandatory that you be a part of this system.

See above webcast for video

When I have a number of different pieces of data, I like to lay it all out in bit size pieces so the picture becomes clearer so I’m going to lay out the data and cut through the political circular logic and legal ease:

2004:
Class II implantable devices receive FDA approval and verachip VeriMed electronic health records system also received approval from the FDA.

2009:
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act authorized $23 billion in stimulus funds for health care information technology. In conjunction with that, VeriChip re-launches VeriMed electronic health records system which is a system that is made up of implantable RFID microchips, handheld scanners for emergency room personnel to read these chips, and online electronic personal health records.

2010:
HR3200 was passed by the House and signed into law by the president
Now looking at the new law, Page 259 Electronic Medical Records system will be required for all healthcare providers by 2012.

Pages 1001-1002:
A national medical device registry is created and populated with devices. Chiefly noted among them, a Class II medical device that is implantable.

Pages 1002-1004:
Mandates the use of class II implantable devices to serve as the link between you and your electronic medical records.

Page 1005:
The secretary of human services will establish the procedures for the linking of the Class II implantable device and electronic medical records.

Page 1007:
Secretary of health and human services is given full power to intact all items required in the creation of the registry as well as the power to dictate how the devises listed in the National Medical Device Registry are to be used and implemented.

Page 503:
Medical device surveillance is authorized.

Page 58:
The link to your electronic medical records which is the Class II implantable device will also be linked to your bank account.

Page 1006:
Without regard to whether or not final regulations are in place, you will be required to get a Class II implantable device linked to your medical records and bank account in order to participate in the government healthcare plan.

Pages 155-158:
It is mandated that you have health insurance or you will pay $100.00 dollars per day that you are not covered.

Page 159:
The IRS will enforce healthcare enrolment and fines for not caring health insurance.

Lastly:
This law mandates that you have to have insurance and by virtue of this law, guarantees that all privet healthcare insurers will be driven out of business with only the government option left. We will be in a single payer system and you will have to have an imbedded chip to be a member of this system and it is mandatory that you be a part of this system.

This new law, when fully implemented, provides the framework for making the United States the first nation in the world to require each and every one of its citizens to have implanted in them a radio-frequency identification microchip. In theory, the intent to streamline healthcare and to eliminate fraud via “health chips” seems right. But, to have the world’s lone superpower mandate a device to be IMPLANTED is not just scary. It is prophetic!

Is this in its current form the mark of the beast? No it is not. The Bible is clear that this will not become the mark of the beast until midway through tribulation when it is somehow associated with a sign of allegiance to the antichrist and it is in someway imprinted with a number or symbols associated 666.

However this is the very mechanism by which it will happen and obviously since the mark will be on a global scale, this has not fully played out. Keep in mind though, we are already staring down the barrel of a global government who will implement this on a global scale. Also, the rapture is a game changing event. If the global government hasn’t come to fruition at the point of the rapture, it will overnight when the rapture happens and this law will be applied across the board. I wouldn’t be surprised if same healthcare ruse won’t be applied under the premises that the mass disappearance of people is a global healthcare emergency and the application of this law [globally and under a global government] will prevent others from disappearing or at a minimum be a means of determining what happened via the tracking capability inherent to RFID chips.

Now I’m going to ask you the question that I asked earlier: Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy? By virtue of the fact that this hasn’t sent tremors through the Christian community, one can only assume that community is asleep at the wheel. Maybe everyone is so bogged down in all the other evil facets to this new law that this has slipped through the cracks. I tend to doubt that is the case though. I think the reason that hardly no one has seemed to even so much as mentioned this is because human nature is kicking in and it’s hard to get past the logical mind when it is telling you that this just can’t be or this is somehow a misrepresentation of the new law and all those who had a part in it. Mixed in with that, no one wants to risk their reputation or for some their ministries reputation by saying something that could get them labeled as conspiracy nut.

Captain Edward Smith, captain of the titanic said this statement shortly before the titanic embarked on its maiden voyage:
“I cannot imagine any condition which would cause a ship to founder. I cannot conceive of any vital disaster happening to this vessel. Modern shipbuilding has gone beyond that.”

The point here is that people to tend see and believe what they want to see and believe and in this case, what’s easiest to not see and not believe.

See above webcast for video

All that you have seen so far is a matter of fact and easily investigated by yourself. So I say again, is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy?

Romans 13:11
And do this, understanding the present time. The hour has come for you to wake up from your slumber, because our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed.

October 16, 2012 - Posted by | Here And Now, Home, Must See, Political Corruption, The United States of America Constitution, Videos | , , , , , , ,

20 Comments »

  1. Although the assertion that the Affordable Care Act mandates that the majority of people receive a RFID chip implant has been soundly debunked but there has been a resurgence in the hoax. It is concerning to see that otherwise cautious and credible people are falling for it and perpetuation this disinformation.

    http://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/2012/07/10/healthcare-rfid-and-medical-devices-worry-or-not/

    Like

    Comment by Hank Louis | October 24, 2012

  2. The language you claim comes from the law came from an earlier proposal that was never passed into law. None of the language you cite appears in the final law. There never was a requirement that anyone be implanted with RFID chips.

    Have you ever checked Snopes or any other urban legend site?

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/microchip.asp

    Like

    Comment by Hank Louis | October 24, 2012

  3. You seem to be stuck, Ed. I have answered all of your points. Just because those responses are not in agreement with yours, does not mean that I did not offer them!
    Every time a doorway to “the good of the whole,” is opened, even a tiny crack, human nature eventually flings that door wide open. And human nature being what it is, it matters not what was intended but what it leads to. Whatever “good” opened the door to the future, when governmental controls are in place, oppression and tyranny follow. This is empirically substantiated! If one searches global, governmental histories, one can clearly see the path human beings always take when handed extraordinary power and control. They cannot help themselves, which is why our U.S. Constitution was written for a Republic rather than a Democracy. Most people confuse the two very different forms of government, and that, simplifying things, is why and how we got where we are today, under the thumb of this Administration, as well previous ones that reigned from the left!
    HIPAA? That act also began with “good” in mind, but if one reads it thoroughly, one sees that rather than protecting our identity and privacy, it actually legalizes the sharing of private information with anybody and everybody except one’s own family! I have yet to meet a medical worker who has read it, in full, or who knows what privacy issues abound within the act. The doctor-patients confidentiality has always been in place, and regardless of how many times one hears “HIPAA ensures your privacy,” that is hogwash! It opens doorways to your information. “Tracking information” are the two scariest words in the present human condition.
    As to linking bank accounts, where you absent the day the President spoke about the extra 17,000 IRS agents who will be hired just to oversee, and handle, debits from our bank accounts to ensure payments for premiums? Finally, because you continue to accuse me falsely, I am finished discussing the state of our union with you. Comment all you like. However, none will be published.

    Like

    Comment by duckyack | October 23, 2012

  4. Furthermore, you may question my wisdom, but that does not concern me. What does deeply concern me is that you express several symptoms of a personality disorder.

    Right. Lecture me on rationality after you retract the false claims in this post.

    RFID implants: Not in the Affordable Care Act (you’ve still got the links, right?).
    RFID implants: Not being manufactured any more (again, you’ve got the links).
    RFID technology can be used for disease treatment and monitoring, particularly for diabetes — so finding “class II implantables” still in existence is not evidence for your case, but more likely evidence for good medical technology.
    Links to bank accounts: Complete fiction. Total hoax.
    Linking data: See HIPAA, and how information tracking prevents hospital error, promotes quick and accurate diagnosis and treatment.
    No mandate for implantable devices, no mandate for links to implantable devices.

    While you’re invoking scripture, be sure to visit Romans 1.18-20. The truth is clear, to those who look at the real materials. Don’t trust those who tell you what is not there, and those who cover up what is there.

    Like

    Comment by Ed Darrell | October 23, 2012

  5. Because your comment has ratcheted down, I’m happy to discuss the issue with you, but I will not let myself, or my followers get caught up in an angry argument. We both have a difference of opinion, and thank God we still have some right to that freedom. If you will keep the tone to a reasonable level, you are welcome to, although I cannot imagine a reason for that. If it is, as you stated, hoping I will come to my senses, I am as sure of my views as you are of yours. I will not change my mind, and that makes me nothing less than an individual with her own point of view, which does not come via a gossip pipeline, but from my own research.

    Regarding the ire you have displayed on my posts, I want you to know, Ed, that unless I place my own personal opinion on a particular post, I am merely posting the news and/or what others are saying. I clearly provide credit where credit is due on the top line of each post, where everyone can see who wrote the piece and from which it came. My own opinions, if I have any, are added under the title, “MY TWO SENSE,” usually placed at the bottom of the article, and those are always signed “Just Me.” Also, if I insert a comment in the article’s title line, I do so by enclosing it with parentheses, and I add “JM,” two spaces to the right, at the end of said statement, and end parentheses. Now, I will attempt to respond to your latest charges.

    Relative to the post on the RFIDs, please take note that I remember claiming it was in the Obama health care bill, proper, and unless that bill has been significantly reduced, it remains over 2400 pages. The implants article came from a government website of the House Ways and Means Committee. The implants were first made in 2004, and that was four years before your boy took office. So, clearly, I personally did not blame Obamacare for the invention!
    You stated that the RFID implants are no longer made. I have not checked that out, so I cannot say the statement is correct. I first need to search worldwide for makers of Class II implants, just as you should have if you wanted to be mistake-free in your claims about the article. Also, if the mentioned maker no longer manufactures the implants, that does not mean the plan is one, a hoax, as you claimed, or two, no longer a part of the Administration’s plan. What about the implants in school children to keep track of truancy?

    You said that I cast dispersions on your intellect and your sanity. I did, and so did you. Forty years of experience makes it difficult not to reach out if I see a problem. As to your level of proof: I always offer links that support my points, and I offer links for the opinions of others. If I can find no support for what another blogs, I do not post it, period. If what I provide to my followers doesn’t suit your idea of ‘proof,’ then I suppose you will just have to accept that or not. However, when I am satisfied, then I am satisfied.

    I did delete your comments because as I’ve already stated, this is my blog site. Commenting on it is a privilege and not your right. I felt your tone was revving up to an uncomfortable level. You stated that you’ve “never questioned (my) right to be an ill-tempered censor,” while at the same time calling me names and using one of the most infamous Marxist/Communists play book in history. Now, if you, and everyone else will read your last comment, it will be completely clear who uses Alinsky tactics of name-calling, demeaning, demonizing, and denigrating those who disagrees with you—a tactic often used by this Administration. Look at Obama’s campaign for the Senate of 2004.

    When you claim that you have “never questioned (my) right to be an ill-tempered censor,” you just did that with more name-calling, as you did throughout what you wrote. Furthermore, you may question my wisdom, but that does not concern me. What does deeply concern me is that you express several symptoms of a personality disorder. I have no idea if you have ever felt out of control or that others are out to get you, but seeing a professional is not a bad idea for anyone in these times. Even if your only problem is when you are responding to conservative blogs, then perhaps it is best that you stay away from such anxiety provoking arenas. I don’t want you to have a stroke, Ed.

    I suggest you read Rules For Radicals to observe and recognize your tactics. I have no way of proving that I have read it, nor do feel the need to prove that to you. By the same token, since you have never proved your claim that you were a Ronald Reagan appointee, as well as a Washington big shot, I will assume you do not feel that same need to prove!

    Like

    Comment by duckyack | October 22, 2012

  6. Not to bring you to your knees — in the hope you might come to your senses.

    Were I wrong in any of the arguments I’ve made here, why not just rebut my errors? I point out that the RFID chip is no longer manufactured. You delete the post.

    I ask where in the Affordable Care Act is there any language to support implanting of RFID chips (which are no longer made anyway). You call me names. You cast aspersions on my intellect and sanity. But you never point to any evidence that supports your case. So you delete my comments.

    Then, after acting like Joe Stalin for several days, you have the gall to lie about me again Alinsky? You’ve never read him, nor have I. You could discuss, but it would require that you confront some serious errors in claims made here.

    Why not look for the truth with an open discussion?

    Your conscience suffers, not mine.

    I’ve never questioned your right to be an ill-tempered censor. I question your wisdom.

    Like

    Comment by Ed Darrell | October 22, 2012

  7. The following comment came, after several others, and sometimes lengthy rants, toward my guests, friends, and me. The one below, is benign and very different from all of the other villainous comments Ed has used in an effort to hook, prod, and force others, and me, into fighting back at the same base level in which he resides. Even though this man appears cooler, one can see that the man is still fired up–like Obama.

    Ed claimed in his last ‘note’ to me, “If you deleted hate comments, the post at the top here would need to go. As it is, your debating yourself is most comical.”

    The above comment was apparently his last resort, to call me out and bring me to my knees–really? The point Ed appears to be missing, is that this blog belongs to me. Commenting on posts herein, is a PRIVILEGE and not an unalienable right. There are numerous Liberal blogs that suit his tastes and style, yet he hangs around this one, why . . . to see his own words published, or to gain attention, as well as to feed his narcissistic personality? He has no educational purpose and no desire to do anything other than disrupt, demean, and demonize, by using all Alinsky methods that fanatical Liberals use distract. Saul Alinsky’s book, “Rules For Radicals,” is loaded with techniques and tricks on how to enrage, blind, and distract opponents. I’ve read it and the Marxist formula does not work on me!

    Like

    Comment by duckyack | October 22, 2012

  8. Ed, you do not only have a difference of opinion, you use very strong, terror-inducing verbiage. I have trashed five or six of your rantings, as I refuse to post your kind of loathing. It’s my feeling that you will go away and leave decent folks alone if I ignore your enraged and volatile language. Hate comments do not belong on this blog site, but I welcome opinions as long as they are respectful.

    Like

    Comment by duckyack | October 21, 2012

  9. This comment is not really for you, Ed. I don’t believe you would use any of the following for any reason other than to refute. There is one thing I’m curious about and that is how you came to the conclusion you did about the RFID being a hoax. I just now read your comment in full, and I’ve determined that you are completely in the dark about most, or all, of the information I post. Another thing, I will not spend time touting my academic record or experience for your own gratification. I did the research work, the citations are prominent on the posts, and I’m not going to lead or guide you through the process. No doubt you will decide that my refusal is because I don’t have any, and that’s fine with me. I feel sorry for you and others like you who live in a fool’s paradise with respect to this Administration. Ignoring citations relative to M. Obama’s court order doesn’t make your case.

    Clearly, you have no idea of the truth regarding Obama’s records, and you most likely have been in the dark about many, many things from the beginning. The fact of his sealed records is a matter of public knowledge, are being dealt with in courts, and have been since the first suit was filed to open them. The information regarding the congressman who proposed the bill to continue sealing those records, after Obama leaves office, was obtained from TV news, one or two days ago.

    Regarding the phony second debate–The fact that you did not view the posted videos proving that the debate was rigged, speaks volumes about your own ability to stick to the truth and about your propensity to support falsehoods. The rules of engagement, with respect to the second Presidential debate, were clearly defined prior to its beginning. Within the debate, the First Lady led an outburst of applause when Crowley, the moderator, lied by omission, regarding Obama’s use of the words “terrorist attack,” the day after Benghazi. Candy Crowley, misled viewers about the context of those two words, and Michelle Obama, as stated above, led others, in disruptive applause (she, being the leader and the loudest). She and all who joined her should be ashamed of themselves. Willingly disregarding rules is indicative of these two, as I have said before, narcissists. They do not accept that rules apply to them. Beyond that, you will never witness an actual “woman of infinite grace and charm,” violate rules or regulations so blatantly and knowingly. And the moment you say, “but clapping for her husband, is no big deal,” you reflect the same mindset. Clear violations, regardless of weight, indicate a certain willingness, in an individual, to disregard other constraints, typically when he/she can’t see how said constraint relates personally.

    Moving on, you are clearly misinformed about the Illinois regulations for law licensing, licensees,and the the maintenance of a law license. Also, you are misled as to the reasons an attorney would even consider retiring the law license, and it has nothing, if anything, to do with the flimsy excuses you offered above.

    The Communist, Marxist, Socialist, and Nazi Parties of the USA, endorse Barack Obama. You can find that information easily enough if you really want to know. I suspect that isn’t your goal. But personally, I find the fact of those endorsements frightening. Even more frightening is the fact that people who think like you, do so under the misunderstanding that we are a Democracy. Our actually intended form of government is a Republic. The Founders created a Republic because under those rules government remains small, people rule the government–not vice versa–and the laws of the land are supported by those principles of a Republic. For decades we have been taught, and even brainwashed into believing that our true form of government is Democracy. The main difference in the two, is that any kind of “ism” can grow out of Democracy, and as to what kind of “ism” that eventually forms, it all depends on the rulers at the time. No “ism” can possibly evolve from a Republic because it opposes all kinds of tyranny, oppression, ideas like ‘the ends justify the means,’ and/or that what is good for the whole outweighs the good of the individual. If anyone wants to learn about the intentions for this country, you can get the answers from “The 5000 Year Leap,” by W. Cleon Skousen, first publication in 1981, but specifically the 19th printing, 2001, forward by Oran Hatch, Preface and Introduction by author, W. Cleon Skousen.

    Like

    Comment by duckyack | October 20, 2012

  10. Well now, you’re just being childish. I haven’t been hysterical since 1969, during the moon landing. And why do your panties get into such a twist when you’re disagreed with? By the way, that’s a symptom of liberalism? Your entire attitude is hateful, cruel, and demented in the sense that your rage clearly thrashes about in your comments, and I suspect runs your life. You don’t hate me, you despise yourself. That’s unfortunate because clearly, you are an intelligent individual. You are trading the time and energy it takes to defend an ideology that you and I will never agree on, trading it for peace of mind during whatever time you have left in this life. Regardless of any disagreement, I will only stick around for so long when the discussion becomes unsavory before I get up and change seats. I’m changing seats, but let me save you some time by writing the response I will surely get:

    “THERE!! You admit that you were all wrong and that I’ve always been right! You are no patriot and you perpetrate hoaxes against the most wonderful man that has done more to, whoops, I mean ‘for’ this country than any other President, EVER!! Now, go stick your head in a toilet and stop haunting sites that don’t want you around! How was that? A little too calm? Yes?

    Like

    Comment by duckyack | October 20, 2012

  11. All of the information is on my blog post.

    Like

    Comment by duckyack | October 19, 2012

  12. What the hell is wrong with you!? You’re acting like a toddler having a tantrum! I couldn’t care less what you think, believe, pass along, or anything else that’s about YOUYOUYOOU! Every claim you make is more ludicrous than the one before, and neither do I don’t care where you get your information. Think what you want–you will anyway. But stop bothering me, you ignorant, infantile buffoon!

    Like

    Comment by duckyack | October 19, 2012

  13. I’m curious to know to which of the following parties are you a member; The Communist Party USA, The Marxist Party USA, The Socialist Party USA, or The Nazi Party USA? I haven’t the time to determine whether those shining endorsements went to previous Presidents, but if so, more than likely, the support went to Progressive candidates. Let me stop you here, before you claim that if I give you no citations, it’s because I don’t have a leg to stand on. The fact is that no one can change the past, no matter how many times you want to bring it up. And all of you do bring up Bush because in your thought processes it makes sense to you that if the President before was bad, then, by comparison, your guy looks good. That has never worked as a way to teach children not to follow the leader, and it doesn’t work in this debate either!

    The above organizations fight against a patriot in the White House, just as you and yours, are fighting to keep Romney out. I would like to know what, precisely, do you believe Obama has done for, not to, but for this nation. You people are up front and anxious to plead for your guy, and you don’t hesitate to buy into this Administration’s lies. For instance, the proof that the second Presidential debate was scripted stares you in the face, yet you refuse to see it. And Michelle Obama ignored even more rules of that debate when she led a round of applause after the moderator lied for the President regarding Libya.

    No matter how you spin it, the debate was a fraud, and the First Lady behaved in a way that surprised no one. She, and all individuals, who believe they are entitled to special treatment, that they are above the law, those who take what doesn’t belong, and demand that others keep them in a way in which they have become accustomed are parasites. These characteristics, in part, describe narcissism. And that personality disorder is dangerous in any setting!

    From the beginning I have wanted to know why the Obama records are not only sealed, but a multimillion-dollar fight, continues in courtrooms. John McCain was thoroughly vetted, and was asked for his records, which he turned over. But Barack Obama refused, and those documents remain secret. What is he hiding? Why has a Democrat submitted a bill that will continue those seals even after Obama leaves the Oval Office? Why did both, he and Michelle, “retire” their law licenses—she in 1993, and he in early 2008. Why was Michelle’s employment title claim her as legal counsel if she was court ordered not to practice? Yes, there is a court order against her playing lawyer. Lawyers do not negate their licenses for weak reasons. The educated guess is that both he and she were involved in nefarious activities and were forced into early retirement. Aren’t you interested in the whys of anything thus far? No Liberal, Progressive, Nazi, Socialist, Marxist, or Communist has given us a single logical answer.

    I’ve heard all of the pejorative terms rolling around on your tongue, at this moment, and they, too, have lost their power! If you can offer anything truthful, reasonable, from a respectful point of view, then I’ll listen.

    Like

    Comment by duckyack | October 19, 2012

  14. I’m curious to know to which of the following parties are you a member; The Communist Party USA, The Marxist Party USA, The Socialist Party USA, or The Nazi Party USA? I haven’t the time to determine whether those shining endorsements went to previous Presidents, but if so, more than likely, the support went to Progressive candidates. Let me stop you here, before you claim that if I give you no citations, it’s because I don’t have a leg to stand on. The fact is that no one can change the past, no matter how many times you want to bring it up. And all of you do bring up Bush because in your thought processes it makes sense to you that if the President before was bad, then, by comparison, your guy looks good. That has never worked as a way to teach children not to follow the leader, and it doesn’t work in this debate either!

    The above organizations fight against a patriot in the White House, just as you and yours, are fighting to keep Romney out. I would like to know what, precisely, do you believe Obama has done for, not to, but for this nation. You people are up front and anxious to plead for your guy, and you don’t hesitate to buy into this Administration’s lies. For instance, the proof that the second Presidential debate was scripted stares you in the face, yet you refuse to see it. And Michelle Obama ignored even more rules of that debate when she led a round of applause after the moderator lied for the President regarding Libya.

    No matter how you spin it, the debate was a fraud, and the First Lady behaved in a way that surprised no one. She, and all individuals, who believe they are entitled to special treatment, that they are above the law, those who take what doesn’t belong, and demand that others keep them in a way in which they have become accustomed are parasites. These characteristics, in part, describe narcissism. And that personality disorder is dangerous in any setting!

    From the beginning I have wanted to know why the Obama records are not only sealed, but a multimillion-dollar fight, continues in courtrooms. John McCain was thoroughly vetted, and was asked for his records, which he turned over. But Barack Obama refused, and those documents remain secret. What is he hiding? Why has a Democrat submitted a bill that will continue those seals even after Obama leaves the Oval Office? Why did both, he and Michelle, “retire” their law licenses—she in 1993, and he in early 2008. Why was Michelle’s employment title claim her as legal counsel if she was court ordered not to practice? Yes, there is a court order against her playing lawyer. Lawyers do not negate their licenses for weak reasons. The educated guess is that both he and she were involved in nefarious activities and were forced into early retirement. Aren’t you interested in the whys of anything thus far? No Liberal, Progressive, Nazi, Socialist, Marxist, or Communist has given us a single logical answer.

    I’ve heard all of the pejorative terms rolling around on your tongue, at this moment, and they, too, have lost their power! If you can offer anything truthful, reasonable, from a respectful point of view, then I’ll listen.

    Like

    Comment by duckyack | October 19, 2012

  15. Ed, euphemisms or not, you are crude and rude. Now, I know you know how to research. Look for yourself before you flat out deny!

    Like

    Comment by duckyack | October 18, 2012


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Political Vel Craft

Veil Of Politics

Political Film Blog

money, power, injustice, sex, violence, propaganda, anti-fascism...

@AMeansstotheend

Fighting Against Government Harassment

Constitutional Clayton

Politics surrounding the Constitution

mike884

Smile! You’re at the best WordPress.com site ever

John Groves Art Stuff

Art from johngrovesart

swissdefenceleague

Swiss Defence League

the seaton post

A little bit of this and a little bit of that

Jericho777's Blog

Correcting Misinformation!

%d bloggers like this: