THE BLAZE by JASON HOWERTON (MY TWO THENTH: MALITHA HARRITH-SPEECH-IMPEDIMENT-PERRY, MOUTHPIECE FOR MSNBC & COMMUNITARIAN GOVERNMENT, tells us everything we need to know concerning the agenda of this government. Regardless of how much like Sylvester, the cartoon cat, she speaks, we cannot dismiss her as a cartoon character. She, as well as all Progressives, is dangerous and means every word that falls from her lips. If you are interested in going back to look at Obama’s campaign speeches prior to his first election, you will verify that he, too, said exactly what he meant. It was the voters who inferred what they wanted to, and that “We are only five days away from fundementally transforming America,” did NOT mean transparency in Washington, solid unity of all American citizens, regardless of color, and judicial fairness for all. What he actually meant was that he would transform the US into a shattered, devisive, and completely controlled population. He meant to use every tactic set down by his teachers and mentors, such as Saul Alinsky, Professors Cloward and Piven, and the infamous Communist Frank Marshall Davis, who some believe is Obama’s biological father. We are in big trouble here, friends, and we are beyond our time to do anything about it. This administration has set up roadblocks to liberty so quickly that the individual citizen cannot keep up, let alone fight the atrocities. We are under Communist rule, and that, above all else, must be understood before we can fight the continuing agenda. There are many true American organizations fighting the good fight, and we all must join one or more of the causes that enrage you the most. If we are to have any hope of retrieving what’s been stolen from us, we have to act now! And for God’s sake, do not be lulled into a false sense of security when the Progressive tells you that his/her words are merely for the common good and that you have misunderstood those words, know two things. “For the common good,” equals Communism and you have NOT misunderstood the words. The reason they speak in vague verbiage is so that when confronted, he/she can “explain” it away with denials. That is a battle tactic that has worked for so many years, but no more! If Progressive lips are moving, a lie is coming out. 4-24-13JM)
Melissa Harris-Perry: Boston Bombing Suspects’ Islamic Faith Is as Irrelevant as Ben Affleck Movies in Investigation
Apr. 22, 2013 12:10am
Seemingly ignoring FBI-confirmed evidence that at least one of the suspected Boston bombers was a likely follower of radical Islam, MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry this weekend argued that the alleged terrorists’ Muslim faith is currently irrelevant in the investigation into the attack.
In fact, according to Harris-Perry, the Tsarnaev brothers’ faith right now is about as relevant to the investigation as Ben Affleck movies that depict violence in Boston. The host and her panel agreed that any attempts to draw a connection between the Boston terror attack and the alleged bombers’ Muslim faith at this point is the result of wanting to “otherize” the bombers in order to understand the violence.
“We don’t really know,” Harris-Perry said, throwing her hands up as if there is no evidence suggesting the suspected attackers may have embraced a radicalized version of Islam. “The younger brother, he’s getting all kinds of tweets from his friends.”
The host did leave a small window open that perhaps it could be later discovered the alleged bombers could have been motivated by a radical ideology by saying: “I think part of the answer is that it’s still an open question.”
Georgetown University professor Michael Eric Dyson said “[Americans] fill in the blanks with the stereotypes… we fill in the blanks with what makes us feel most comfortable that this was an exceptional, extraordinary case that happened because they are this.”
Harris-Perry then made her Affleck reference. “I keep wondering: is it possible that there would ever be a discussion like, ‘oh, this is because of Ben Affleck and the connection between Boston and movies about violence? And, of course, the answer is no,” she said.
Obviously, not all Muslims subscribe to radical Islam. Additionally, it has not been proven that radical Islam definitely played a role in the Boston bombings. However, if people who watched Ben Affleck movies routinely murdered innocent people in violent attacks — as radical Islamists do — America at large would probably take a closer look at the actor’s films. Further, law enforcement would be ill-advised to ignore the connection if they were investigating someone for murder who happened to own 100 Ben Affleck DVDs and such a correlation existed. Clearly, Harris-Perry’s comparison is dubious at best.
“Given that they’re Chechen, given that they are literally Caucasian, our very sense of connection to them is this framed up notion of, like, Islam making them into something that is non-white,” Harris-Perry added.
“The point is that it’s important to say, ‘that’s not us.’ This is not American, this is not who we are,” Dyson theorized. “We want to demonize the other. We have to distance it from the dominant culture.”
Watch the segment via MSNBC below:
Featured image via Getty
(H/T: Noah Rothman, Mediaite)
No comments yet.