SO HERE AND NOW

Conservative Political Views

BREITBART BIG GOVERNMENT by AWR HAWKINS


Students Suspended For Holding Airsoft Guns In Photo Taken In Living Room

Two Massachusetts high school sweethearts—Tito Velez and Jamie Pereira—are suspended from school after posing with Airsoft toy guns for a photograph at home before attending a homecoming dance last week.

Pereira and Velez are students at Bristol-Plymouth Regional Technical School. The photo was taken by Velez’s father in their living room and then posted to Facebook.

According to NECN.com, Pereira said, “We took [the pictures] with the Airsoft guns because that’s our hobby, and we wanted to include them.” But school officials argue that the photo caused “a disruption at the school.”

School district superintendent Dr. Richard Gross said he didn’t have a problem with the Airsoft guns, and he understands free speech. However, he “takes issue with the caption below the photo that reads ‘Homecoming 2014.'” He added: “When you tie that to a school event, that’s something to be concerned about.”

Velez defended the couple’s photograph on CBS Boston, explaining that the guns are toys that shoot plastic pellets. Yet Dr. Gross said the entire homecoming dance would have been canceled had police discovered the photo prior to the start of the event.

The suspension may last as long as 10 days, although the superintendent says there will be a hearing to consider reducing the punishment.

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

MY TWO SENSE

After I take photos of family or other functions, I always title it with descriptive words so that years later, when I feel nostalgic, and look at pictures of times gone by, I’ll know when and where the shots were taken.  I don’t see the difference here.  Gross claimed that had the police known about the photo, they would have shut down the dance altogether.  I tend to believe that as Massachusetts is a state in which Islamic terrorists live and torment Americans whenever their paths cross.  That state is like a third-world country, surrounded on all sides, by states of the United States of America.  Massachusetts’ state legislative body leans so far Left it lies on its side, and it continues to rotate.  Here’s a thought, I wonder if Dr. Richard Gross is a racist!?  Hmmmmmmmmmm . . . .

JUST ME

October 30, 2014 Posted by | Here And Now, Home | , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE BLAZE by ERICA RITZ (MY TWO SENSE: When you have to get your anger out because somebody in a position of power betrays you and your fellow countrymen, you look for words, any words, to describe your target, the betrayer. In the case of Nixon, it was, “Richard I-am-not-a-crook Nixon.” And Jimmy Carter was, “Jimmy I-lusted-in-my-heart Carter. Janet Napolitano has become, “Janet lying-fatass-dyke Napolitano,” and she betrays this nation everytime she opens her mouth. Call for a Congressional hearing is past due. JM) 4-24-13


 

 

Crime

Janet Napolitano’s Major Admission: Saudi Student Was Put on Watchlist

 

 

Napolitano Responds to Grassley Questions About Saudi National Questioned in Boston Bombings

(Photo: C-SPAN)

 

Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano admitted Tuesday that a Saudi national once identified as a “person of interest” in the Boston Marathon bombings was put on a terror watchlist after the attack.

 

Last week, she refused to answer any questions about the Saudi, calling South Carolina Rep. Jeff Duncan’s inquiry “so full of misstatements and misapprehension that it’s just not worthy of an answer.”

 

But today, speaking at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on immigration reform, Napolitano responded to a question posed by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa).

 

“Before the [Tsarnaev] brothers became the focus of the investigation, authorities questioned a Saudi student who reportedly was on a terror watchlist,” Grassley said.  “I sent a letter to you this morning asking for answers to questions about the bombers and how they interacted with your agency, I trust you will promptly respond…”

 

“With regard to the Saudi student, was he on a watchlist, and if so, how did he obtain a student visa?” Grassley asked.

 

Napolitano firmly responded: “He was not on a watchlist.  What happened is — this student was, really when you back it out, he was in the wrong place at the wrong time.  He was never a subject.  He was never even really a person of interest.  Because he was being interviewed, he was at that point put on a watchlist, and then when it was quickly determined he had nothing to do with the bombing, the watch listing status was removed.” [Emphasis added]

 

Watch the entire interaction via C-SPAN below (if the video doesn’t load right away, hit refresh):

 

The Saudi national, identified as Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, was set to be deported for terrorist activity under section 212, 3B after the Boston Marathon bombings, according to TheBlaze’s sources. His status was abruptly changed last week, but government officials have thus far rarely spoken in public about the subject, let alone provided any additional information.  But Napolitano’s account today confirms a report by TheBlaze on Monday. It details how a Department of Homeland Security official told us that Alharbi was placed on a terror watchlist after being detained.

However, Napolitano has thus far refused to comment on why Alharbi was given the Section 212, 3B terrorist designation despite inquiries from Sen. Grassley and members of the House Homeland Security Committee.

 

Alharbi is currently considered innocent and in no way connected to the Boston bombings, or the two brothers identified as suspects by the FBI.

 

It was a rough day on the hill for Napolitano as she was also grilled by lawmakers regarding the conflicting accounts of whether the FBI knew the older Boston bombing suspect, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, had made a trip to Russia.

 

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was particularly concerned about the conflicting reports coming from the FBI and DHS about the older suspect’s Russia trip. He told Napolitano “They told me that they had no knowledge of him leaving or coming back so I would like to talk to you more about this case.”

 

This is a breaking news story. Updates may be added.

 

 

Related:

 

 

 

April 24, 2013 Posted by | Here And Now, Home, Videos | , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

MIRROR NEWS by CHRIS BUCKTIN, ANDY LINES


Sean Collier - Somerville Police ... Police Of...

Sean Collier – Somerville Police … Police Officer killed in shootout at MIT campus (13:37 EST, 19 April 2013) …item 2b.. You Raise Me Up …item 3.. The role of social media in recovery (Apr. 18, 2013) … (Photo credit: marsmet547)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Boston bombers: FBI hunting 12-strong terrorist “sleeper cell” linked to brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

 


21 Apr 2013 00:01

 

Police believe the pair were specially trained to carry out the devastating attack

 

 

 

Covered boat: Fugitive was found in back yard

Covered boat: Fugitive was found in back yard

AP

 

The FBI was last night hunting a 12-strong terrorist “sleeper cell” linked to the Boston marathon bomb brothers.

 

Police believe Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were specially trained to carry out the devastating attack.

 

More
than 1,000 FBI operatives were last night working to track down the
cell and arrested a man and two women 60 miles from Boston in the hours
before Dzhokhar’s dramatic capture after a bloody shootout on Friday.

 

A
source close to the investigation said: “We have no doubt the brothers
were not acting alone. The devices used to detonate the two bombs were
highly sophisticated and not the kind of thing people learn from Google.

 

“They
were too advanced. Someone gave the brothers the skills and it is now
our job to find out just who they were. Agents think the sleeper cell
has up to a dozen members and has been waiting several years for their
day to come.”

 

A specialist team of CIA and FBI interrogators was
yesterday flown to a Boston hospital to grill wounded Dzhokhar, 19,
about the secret group. The University of Massachusetts student was
caught on Friday after hiding out in a boat parked in a garden in locked
down Watertown the day after a gun battle with police left his
26-year-old brother and a rookie cop dead.

 

Dzhokhar is said to
have run his brother over as he escaped in a stolen car while Tamerlan
lay handcuffed on the ground. They were carrying six bombs with them at
the time, three of which ­exploded, as well as a handgun and rifle. The
devices were thought to be pipe bombs.

 

Last night Dzhokhar – badly
wounded but alive – lay handcuffed to his hospital bed under armed
guard. The other three arrested in the port of New Bedford are also
believed to be of college age.

 

Still infrared image from police search of boat where Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was found hiding

An aerial infrared image shows the outline of Dzhokhar hiding in the boat

 

AP

 

Dzhokhar even went to a college party two days after the
bombs wreaked havoc at the finish line. According to fellow students, he
“looked relaxed” as he joined in a party at the campus on Wednesday
night.

 

Hours later he was involved in the shootout which saw his brother killed.

 

Investigators
have begun piecing together how the “well-mannered” brothers of Chechen
origin were radicalised. Neighbours of the family said older brother
Tamerlan had recently become obsessed with Islam. He mysteriously left
the US in January last year to spend six months in Russia. Yesterday
senior FBI counter-terrorism official Kevin Brock said: “It’s a key
thread for investigators.”

 

It also emerged the Bureau interviewed
Tamerlan two years ago, at the request of the Russian government, but
could not establish that he had ties to terrorist radicals.

 

This
was despite his worrying Russian-language YouTube page featuring links
to extremist Islamic sites and others since taken down by YouTube.

 

One
link showed an hour-long speech by an Islamic teacher called Shaykh
Feiz Mohammed, while other videos are labled “Terrorists” and “Islam”.

 

The
radical cleric, with links to extremist British Muslims, encouraged his
followers to become martyrs for Islam. He said: “Teach them this: There
is nothing more beloved to me than wanting to die as a mujahid.”

 

Yesterday
the brothers’ mother Zubeidat, speaking from her home in Russia, added
further intrigue to her sons’ murky past when she claimed the boys had
been framed by the FBI over the two bombs last Monday that left three
dead and 178 injured.

 

Chechen bombers: Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev at the Boston Marathon

 

AP

 

She claimed the FBI had been keeping watch on her eldest boy
for up to five years. She said: “They knew what my son was doing. They
knew what sites on the internet he was going to.

 

“They were
telling me that he was really an extremist leader and that they were
afraid of him. They told me whatever information he is getting, he gets
from these extremist sites. They were controlling him.”

 

The
bombers’ father Anzor wept at news that his youngest son had been
captured alive. In a phone interview with a US news channel he told his

 

son: “Tell police everything. Everything. Just be honest.”

 

US
Government officials have said the brothers were not under surveillance
as possible militants. And an FBI statement said the matter was closed
because interviews with Tamerlan and family members “did not find any
terrorism activity, domestic or foreign”. But now they believe the pair,
who emigrated to the United States from Dagestan about a decade ago,
were part of a terror cell.

 

College dropout Tamerlan’s American
wife Katherine Russell, 24, and their three-year-old daughter Zahara
were yesterday thrown into the spotlight. She was a Christian before
they married but converted to Islam. Her parents Warren, a doctor, and
Judith were said to be “stunned” by their son-in-law’s involvement in
the tragedy.

 

Judith and Warren issued a joint statement saying:
“Our daughter has lost her husband today, the father of her child. In
the aftermath of the Patriot’s Day horror, we know we never really knew
Tamerlan Tsarnaev. Our hearts are sickened by the horror he has
inflicted.”

 

Katherine, wearing a black hijab, was picked up by FBI
agents at their home in Cambridge near Boston on Friday. Dope-smoker
Dzhokhar was captured after a Watertown resident called police to say
the fugitive was hiding in a boat in his back garden.

 

David
Henneberry had gone into his garden for a cigarette after police lifted
restrictions on people leaving their homes, believing the bomber had
left the area. He noticed that the cover over his boat had blood on it
and a strap had been cut. He went back into the house to get a
stepladder and looked inside.

 

His stepson Robert said: “He stuck
his head under the tarp and noticed a pool of blood and something
crumpled up in a ball. Instead of being a hero of the moment and yelling
at what we now know was the suspect, he did the right thing and called
911.”

 

Police immediately evacuated the family and surrounded the
house, using a megaphone to tell Dzhokhar to come out with his hands up.

 

When
he failed to respond they opened fire at the boat’s hull. Robert said:
“They wound up ­shooting a couple of rounds through the boat. He wasn’t
going to like that.”

 

Dzhokhar was wounded by the volley of gunfire
and police were able to move in and arrest him. They later released
infrared pictures taken from a helicopter showing Dzhokhar hiding in the
boat.

 

Investigators will interrogate the bomber, still seriously
ill last night, without reading him his rights – using special “public
safety” powers.

 

The family of eight-year-old bombing victim Martin Richard welcomed the arrest of Tsarnaev. “Our community is once again safe from these men,” the family said in a statement.

 

Shortly
before Dzhokhar’s capture, President Obama spoke by phone to Russian
President Vladimir Putin. The White House said Obama “praised the close
co-operation the US has received from Russia on counter-terrorism,
including in the wake of the Boston attack”.

 

There were scenes of celebration across Boston as news spread of the capture of the remaining bomber.

 

Get the latest updates on what happened in Boston.

 

 

 


View gallery 

Getty

 

 – HUNDREDS of extra police called in for today’s London
Marathon will remain despite the death and capture of the Boston
suspects, Scotland Yard said. Security has been boosted for the 36,000
runners and thousands of spectators.

 

 

April 22, 2013 Posted by | Here And Now, Home | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE BLAZE by LIZ KLIMAS


Crime

‘Looked Right At Me’: Victim With Both Legs Amputated Wakes Up From Surgery and Confirms Seeing Bomber

A victim of the Boston bombings Monday with some of the most graphic wounds caught on photograph reportedly woke up in a drugged haze after surgery and in recovery, saw the FBI’s pictures of the two suspects that had been released and said one of them “looked right at me.”

Boston Bombing Victim Says Bombing Suspect Looked Right at Him After Dropping Bag

An emergency responder and volunteers, including Carlos Arredondo in the cowboy hat, push Jeff Bauman in a wheel chair after he was injured in an explosion near the finish line of the Boston Marathon Monday, April 15, 2013 in Boston. This image was cropped due to its graphic nature. At least three people were killed, including an 8-year-old boy, and more than 170 were wounded when two bombs blew up seconds apart. (Photo: AP/Charles Krupa)

The brother of Jeff Bauman, who had both legs amputated below the knee, said in an interview, according to Bloomberg, that the 27-year-old was waiting for his girlfriend to finish the race when he claims to have seen one of the suspects, wearing a black jacket, a cap and sunglasses. He dropped a bag at Bauman’s feet.

“He woke up under so much drugs, asked for a paper and pen and wrote, ‘bag, saw the guy, looked right at me,’” Chris Bauman, Jeff’s brother, said Thursday in an interview.

Chris Bauman is later reported as saying he has been alone with his brother “many times” when he had told him “every single detail.”

As of Thursday just before 11 p.m. EST, gunshots were fired on MIT’s campus and some officials confirmed the death of one of the suspects in Watertown, Massachusetts, while Friday the other remains at large. An MIT police officer was killed in on campus. Boston suburbs are on lockdown Friday morning as a safety precaution.

Boston Bombing Victim Says Bombing Suspect Looked Right at Him After Dropping Bag

“Suspect #2″ is said to still be at large. (Photo: FBI)

Boston Bombing Victim Says Bombing Suspect Looked Right at Him After Dropping Bag

“Suspect #1″ or the “black hat suspect” is reported to have been killed on MIT’s campus in a shootout Thursday night. (Photo: FBI)

Bauman was pictured being rushed from the scene in a wheelchair after the bombings near the finish line just before 3 p.m. April 15. The cowboy hat-wearing man helping rescue him was soon thereafter deemed a hero who helped other victims, and is also the father of a fallen soldier and peace activist who was watching the marathon for those running in honor of his sons.

Bauman’s father said on his Facebook page that his son had to have both lower limbs removed at Boston Medical Center because of extensive vascular and bone damage. He said his son also had to have another surgery because of fluid in his abdomen.

Here’s more from Bloomberg about how the Bauman family found out about Jeff’s condition:

It would take hours before the Bauman family knew what had happened to Jeff. They learned about it the way much of the world did: the grisly image on television of their son being wheeled from the scene, his lower legs destroyed.

Erika Schneider, Bauman’s sister, saw it first. “She called my mom, freaking out,” Chris said. Chris was working at a McDonald’s near their home in Concord, New Hampshire, when his mother called him.

“Chris, you have to sprint home,” she said. “Something’s happened.”

Bauman’s girlfriend was not hurt in the blast. But the victim’s father said his son was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

(H/T: Daily Mail)

Related:

April 19, 2013 Posted by | Home | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

WND by AARON KLEIN


WND EXCLUSIVE

‘Arrests in Pakistan, Afghanistan’ in bombing probe

Al-Qaida forums boast of attack while no group takes official responsibility

Published: 1 day ago

Aaron Klein is WND’s senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio. Follow Aaron on Twitter and Facebook.
rss feed Subscribe to feed

TEL AVIV – An al-Qaida-allied group in the Gaza Strip claimed to WND that there have been arrests of jihadists in both Pakistan and Afghanistan as part of the probe into yesterday’s Boston Marathon explosions.

The arrests could not be immediately confirmed.

Members of Gaza’s Jihadiya Salafia group further said that al-Qaida is being credited for the attack in its affiliated online forums.

The Gaza sources told WND the online al-Qaida forum messages claimed the bombings were an al-Qaida response to a U.S. military airstrike that killed a high-profile Taliban leader and four other Taliban members last week near Afghanistan’s eastern border with Pakistan.

Jihadia Salafia represents al-Qaida in Gaza.

It was not immediately clear whether the Internet claims should be taken seriously or simply represented jihadists utilizing the explosions.

Purchase a copy of “Fool Me Twice” by Aaron Klein and Brenda Elliott and receive a FREE copy of their New York Times bestseller “The Manchurian President.”

President Obama was careful not to use the words “terror” or “terrorism” as he spoke at the White House yesterday, while an administration official said the bombings were being treated as an act of terrorism.

“We will find out who did this. We’ll find out why they did this,” the president said. “Any responsible individuals, any responsible groups, will feel the full weight of justice.”

The FBI has taken charge of the investigation. A 20-year-old Saudi national reportedly was taken into custody near the scene of the attack.

The New York Post reported the suspect was being questioned by the FBI and local police at Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital, where he was under heavy guard while being treated for shrapnel injuries to his leg sustained in one of the blasts.

A large group of federal and state law enforcement agents reportedly raided an apartment in a building in the Saudi man’s hometown of Revere, Mass.

CNN reported the search took place by consent, according to a federal law enforcement source, meaning no search warrant was needed.

The Pakistani Taliban today reportedly denied any role in the marathon bombings.

Media blame right-wing

While the initial indications may point toward Islamic terrorism, some in the media have been speculating it could have been a domestic attack, with some analysts suggesting “right wing extremists” were involved.

CNN national-security analyst Peter Bergen said some of the information will become clear when police reveal what kind of explosive was used.

Bergen said al-Qaida often uses hydrogen peroxide explosives, while another type of explosion might signal that a “right-wing extremist” was involved.

The explosions, Bergan said, reminded him of the Oklahoma City bombing, for which Timothy McVeigh was arrested, convicted and executed.

And Bergen said it also brought to mind other “right-wing” attacks.

“Right-wing groups trying to attack, for instance – trying to attack the Martin Luther King parade in Oregon in 2010,” he said. “So, if it is a device of some kind, you know, we shouldn’t leap to conclusion about where it’s coming from.”

Also today, the U.K. Independent ran a report quoting a terror expert who claimed the marathon attack has hints the handiwork of a right-wing terrorist attack rather than al Qaida-inspired extremism.

Richard Barrett, the former United Nations coordinator for the al-Qaida and Taliban monitoring team, said it was too early to say who was to blame for the marathon blasts.

But Barrett, who has served with Britain’s MI5, MI6 and the Foreign Office, told the Independent the timing of the attack on Patriots’ Day and the relatively small size of the devices suggested the work of a domestic extremist.

Barrett, who is now senior director at the Qatar International Academy for Security Studies, said: “At the moment it looks more likely that it was a right-wing terrorist incident, rather than an al-Qaida attack because of the size of the devices.”

He added: “This happened on Patriots’ Day, it is also the day Americans are supposed to have their taxes in, and Boston is quite a symbolic city. These are all little indicators.”

Boston Police Commissioner Edward Davis said authorities had received “no specific intelligence that anything was going to happen” at the race.

April 17, 2013 Posted by | Home | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

SALON by DAVID SIROTA (MY TWO SENSE–How about Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, his wife? Both white–both domestic terrorists–Larry Grathwohl, who was an FBI agent who joined the Underground, said that Ayers wanted to overthrow the United States government. In an interview that he gave in January 2009, Grathwohl said that: “The thing the most bone chilling thing Bill Ayers said to me was that after the revolution succeeded and the government was overthrown, they believed they would have to eliminate 25 million Americans who would not conform to the new order.” Although Ayers denies that he said this, killing citizens of a usurped government always follows the takeover, and it always will. Such is the nature of dictators and tyranny. JM)


Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American

There is a double standard: White terrorists are dealt with as lone wolves, Islamists are existential threats

Let's hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white AmericanTimothy McVeigh, Osama Bin Laden(Credit: AP/David Longstreath)

As we now move into the official Political Aftermath period of the Boston bombing — the period that will determine the long-term legislative fallout of the atrocity — the dynamics of privilege will undoubtedly influence the nation’s collective reaction to the attacks. That’s because privilege tends to determine: 1) which groups are — and are not — collectively denigrated or targeted for the unlawful actions of individuals; and 2) how big and politically game-changing the overall reaction ends up being.

This has been most obvious in the context of recent mass shootings. In those awful episodes, a religious or ethnic minority group lacking such privilege would likely be collectively slandered and/or targeted with surveillance or profiling (or worse) if some of its individuals comprised most of the mass shooters. However, white male privilege means white men are not collectively denigrated/targeted for those shootings — even though most come at the hands of white dudes.

Likewise, in the context of terrorist attacks, such privilege means white non-Islamic terrorists are typically portrayed not as representative of whole groups or ideologies, but as “lone wolf” threats to be dealt with as isolated law enforcement matters. Meanwhile, non-white or developing-world terrorism suspects are often reflexively portrayed as representative of larger conspiracies, ideologies and religions that must be dealt with as systemic threats — the kind potentially requiring everything from law enforcement action to military operations to civil liberties legislation to foreign policy shifts.

“White privilege is knowing that even if the bomber turns out to be white, no one will call for your group to be profiled as terrorists as a result, subjected to special screening or threatened with deportation,” writes author Tim Wise. “White privilege is knowing that if this bomber turns out to be white, the United States government will not bomb whatever corn field or mountain town or stale suburb from which said bomber came, just to ensure that others like him or her don’t get any ideas. And if he turns out to be a member of the Irish Republican Army we won’t bomb Dublin. And if he’s an Italian-American Catholic we won’t bomb the Vatican.”

Because of these undeniable and pervasive double standards, the specific identity of the Boston Marathon bomber (or bombers) is not some minor detail — it will almost certainly dictate what kind of governmental, political and societal response we see in the coming weeks. That means regardless of your particular party affiliation, if you care about everything from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope the bomber was a white domestic terrorist. Why? Because only in that case will privilege work to prevent the Boston attack from potentially undermining progress on those other issues.

To know that’s true is to simply consider how America reacts to different kinds of terrorism.

Though FBI data show fewer terrorist plots involving Muslims than terrorist plots involving non-Muslims, America has mobilized a full-on war effort exclusively against the prospect of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, the moniker “War on Terrorism” has come to specifically mean “War on Islamic Terrorism,” involving everything from new laws like the Patriot Act, to a new torture regime, to new federal agencies like the Transportation Security Administration and Department of Homeland Security, to wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to mass surveillance of Muslim communities.

By contrast, even though America has seen a consistent barrage of attacks from domestic non-Islamic terrorists, the privilege and double standards baked into our national security ideologies means those attacks have resulted in no systemic action of the scope marshaled against foreign terrorists. In fact, it has been quite the opposite — according to Darryl Johnson, the senior domestic terrorism analyst at the Department of Homeland Security, the conservative movement backlash to merely reporting the rising threat of such domestic terrorism resulted in DHS seriously curtailing its initiatives against that particular threat. (Irony alert: When it comes specifically to fighting white non-Muslim domestic terrorists, the right seems to now support the very doctrine it criticized Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry for articulating — the doctrine that sees fighting terrorism as primarily “an intelligence-gathering, law-enforcement, public-diplomacy effort” and not something more systemic.)

Enter the Boston bombing. Coming at the very moment the U.S. government is planning to withdraw from Afghanistan, considering cuts to the Pentagon budget, discussing civil liberties principles and debating landmark immigration legislation, the attack could easily become the fulcrum of all of those contentious policy debates — that is, depending on the demographic profile of the assailant.

If recent history is any guide, if the bomber ends up being a white anti-government extremist, white privilege will likely mean the attack is portrayed as just an isolated incident — one that has no bearing on any larger policy debates. Put another way, white privilege will work to not only insulate whites from collective blame, but also to insulate the political debate from any fallout from the attack.

It will probably be much different if the bomber ends up being a Muslim and/or a foreigner from the developing world. As we know from our own history, when those kind of individuals break laws in such a high-profile way, America often cites them as both proof that entire demographic groups must be targeted, and that therefore a more systemic response is warranted. At that point, it’s easy to imagine conservatives citing Boston as a reason to block immigration reform defense spending cuts and the Afghan War withdrawal and to further expand surveillance and other encroachments on civil liberties.

If that sounds hard to believe, just look at yesterday’s comments by right-wing radio host Laura Ingraham, whose talking points often become Republican Party doctrine. Though authorities haven’t even identified a suspect in the Boston attack, she (like other conservatives) seems to already assume the assailant is foreign, and is consequently citing the attack as rationale to slam the immigration reform bill.

The same Laura Ingraham, of course, was one of the leading voices criticizing the Department of Homeland Security for daring to even report on right-wing domestic terrorism. In that sense, she perfectly embodies the double standard that, more than anything, will determine the long-term political impact of the Boston bombing.

David Sirota David Sirota is a nationally syndicated newspaper columnist, magazine journalist and the best-selling author of the books “Hostile Takeover,” “The Uprising” and “Back to Our Future.” E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com.

April 17, 2013 Posted by | Home | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

LIBERTY COUNCIL


RESPONSE WITH MY TWO CENTS
Do these liberal doofs realize that they are trying to implement a policy which is against Federal policy already in place?  (“An edict is an announcement of a law, often associated with monarchism. The Pope and various micronational(sic) leaders are currently the only persons who still issue edicts,” from the Urban Dictionary).  Did you get that?  A monarch–king or queen?  Washington, nor State, can put in place a discriminatory edict that attempts to control individual thoughts.  And that’s only one of the problems with this tyrannical act.  The parallel between a monarchy and Obama’s Presidential style are shockingly similar.  Every time he circumvents Congress to pass another law, he violates the checks and balances put in place by the founding documents–he over steps his role within the clearly defined borders of his Executive Branch.  He noses into the Legislative Branch when he chooses, and spreads his assumed powers over the Judicial Branch of our government.  And by the way, Executive Orders are identical to edicts, and that power needs to be taken out of the hands of Presidents and amended into oblivion!
Just Me
Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman
Liberty Counsel
7/27/2012
Liberty Counsel stands behind Chick-fil-A and its president, Dan Cathy, regarding Cathy’s recent statement supporting natural marriage as the union of one man and one woman.  And we denounce the actions of leftist politicians who have threatened illegal discriminatory action against the Chick-fil-A organization!
We have prepared a powerful petition which declares that tens of thousands of outraged Americans support Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy’s First Amendment rights and the biblical view of natural marriage! The petition will be delivered next week. Please join us by adding your name by clicking here and read my important update below – Mat.
vicki,
Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy said he believes in the natural, biblical view of marriage as being between one man and one woman.
How, in America, could that viewpoint possibly be considered controversial or discriminatory?
Have our nation’s values and culture collapsed that far?
Apparently, liberal politicians like Chicago’s Mayor Rahm Emanuel think so. Upon hearing of Cathy’s stand, radical pro-homosexual organizations and sympathizers immediately began calling for boycotts, “kiss-ins,” and other types of protests against the family-friendly national chain of restaurants.
Then, government officials from major U.S. cities like Chicago and Boston said they plan to prevent Chick-fil-A from opening new restaurants in their jurisdictions.
Demanding a public apology from Cathy, Chicago Alderman Joe Moreno said that he will deny Chick-fil-A from opening a restaurant in Chicago’s Logan Square. Boston Mayor Thomas Menino told the Boston Herald that he would block Chick-fil-A from opening a restaurant in the “Cradle of Liberty.”
Never one to “let a good crisis go to waste,” Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel followed suit.  Emanuel’s statement that “Chick-fil-A’s values are not Chicago’s values” was both legally ignorant and ill-advised.  Emanuel, the former Chief of Staff at the Obama White House, surely knows that viewpoint discrimination violates federal Civil Rights statutes!
++These threats of action and discrimination against Chick-fil-A because of the viewpoint of its owner are not only illegal – they are toxic to every business and businessman in America!
To deny business permits or zoning approvals to Chick-fil-A because the president of the privately-owned family business expressed his biblical view of natural marriage is outrageous.
Any city trying to ban Chick-fil-A will not win this battle. If this discrimination is challenged in court – Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino will be eating crow, and in large portions!  Even the ACLU condemned the knee-jerk announcements by ultraliberal Mayors Emanuel and Menino!
These government officials ought to be ashamed. For a public official to threaten denial of a right to do business because the president of a private company supports natural marriage is the height of stupidity and intolerance.
Unfortunately, their response is typical of intolerant homosexual activists. They will go to any lengths to silence the majority of Americans who believe that children do best when raised in a natural family with one mom and one dad.
++Please sign Liberty Counsel’s petition in support of the First Amendment and biblically defined marriage.
Liberty Counsel’s new petition declares that…“we support Dan Cathy’s First Amendment rights – and we endorse his stand on biblically defined marriage!
The LC petition will be delivered to the Chick-fil-A corporate headquarters in Atlanta; the offices of Boston Mayor Tom Menino; Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Alderman Proco Moreno – and we will add deliveries as necessary to cover emerging oppressive tactics by additional government officials or organizations against the Chick-fil-A enterprises.
I am pleased to report that in the first 12 hours of launching our petition over 15,000 of Liberty Counsel’s friends signed!  I feel certain we can quickly reach 100,000 signers if friends like you will join in.
After signing, please forward this message to as many of your like-minded friends and colleagues as possible – this is a landmark battle against the forces of anti-Christian bigotry and intolerance!
Click here to read and add your name to the petition which I would like to deliver on August 2nd, the day after a nationwide “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day” as promoted by former Governor Mike Huckabee:
++Conservative Americans and our faith are under assault!
The intolerance displayed by these leftist government officials ought to serve as a wakeup call to the majority of Americans who support the commonsense understanding of natural marriage.
If given the chance, these intolerant officials would silence ANYONE who dares to support natural marriage.  Sadly, we are seeing similar threats in every level of government.
Please be sure to sign the petition declaring support for the First Amendment rights for every citizen – and your support of natural marriage:
Thanks again for standing for faith and freedom,
Mathew D. Staver, Founder and Chairman
Liberty Counsel
P.S. We will be delivering this petition next week. Please take a moment right now to sign the petition, and then pass it on to others:

Facebook Email Twitter More...

+   +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +  +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +
Note: Please do not “reply” directly to this e-mail message. This e-mail address is not designed to receive your personal messages. To contact Liberty Counsel with comments, questions or to  change your status, see the link at the end of this e-mail.)
+   +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +  +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +

+ + Comments? Questions?

http://www.libertyaction.org/r.asp?U=129414&CID=365&RID=35993437

Liberty Counsel, with offices in Florida, Virginia and Washington, D.C., is a nonprofit litigation, education and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of human life and family.  Liberty Counsel . PO Box 540774 . Orlando, FL 32854 .800-671-1776

July 28, 2012 Posted by | Here And Now | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

GODFATHER POLITICS


Liberal Mayors Deny Businesses the Right to Operate in Their Cities

bostonBig-City mayors are attacking Chick-fil-A by threatening to deny them a business license to operate. These liberal mayors don’t like the public stand the owners have taken on defending biblical marriage. This is tyranny of the first order. First it was punishment for “hate crimes,” then it was for “hate speech,” and now it’s hate “thought crimes.”

The mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, welcomes an anti-semite but refuses to allow a Christian business to operate within the city. Emanuel said, “Chick-fil-A’s values are not Chicago values. They’re not respectful of our residents, our neighbors, and our family members. And if you’re gonna be part of the Chicago community, you should reflect Chicago values.” I suppose the “values” of an anti-semite are Chicago’s values:

Ignoring Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan’s history of anti-Semitic remarks, Mayor Rahm Emanuel on Wednesday welcomed the army of men dispatched to the streets by Farrakhan to stop the violence in Chicago neighborhoods.

Maybe if these gang members had jobs at Chick-fil-A violence would go down. When will Jews get the message that Democrats are not their friends?

Even liberal newspaper editorials think the actions of the mayors of Chicago, Boston, and Mountain View, California, are way out of line:

“Public officials have a responsibility to carry out their ministerial tasks fairly and evenhandedly – and to uphold the principle of free speech – whether or not they like a business executive’s social or political stances,” the [Los Angeles] Times opined.

“The Boston Globe wondered “which part of the First Amendment does [Boston Mayor Thomas] Menino not understand? A business owner’s political or religious beliefs should not be a test for the worthiness of his or her application for a business license.”

What’s next? If a business owner opposes abortion — even though he is not in the anti-abortion business — will that business owner be denied a business license? Will Republican business owners be denied a business license if they oppose ObamaCare?

Will churches be denied the right to exist in liberal cities if they continue to preach against abortion and homosexuality or anything else that the powers that be consider to be ideologically inappropriate? These are not far-fetched concerns. Canada and some European governments will prosecute ministers who take a public stand against homosexuality.

The owners of Chick-fil-A believe certain things. Everybody believes certain things. Does a belief system disqualify someone from operating a business? Boston Mayor Tom Menino knows that he can’t deny a business license to someone for what he believes, so he’s accusing Chick-fil-A of actual discrimination:

“You can’t have a business in the City of Boston that discriminates against a population. We’re an open city. We’re a city that’s at the forefront of inclusion.”

As anyone who has followed this story knows, Chick-fil-A does not discriminate against anyone. Everybody is served. No questions are asked. It wouldn’t surprise me that there are a lot of business owners in Boston who are racists and sexists. Will the mayor shut them down?

Then there’s the job side in all of this. The economy is suffering. People want jobs, and the mayors of these cities are denying people access to a great work environment, good pay, and benefits.

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/6318/liberal-mayors-deny-businesses-the-right-to-operate-in-their-cities/#ixzz21lWjwizk

MY TWO CENTS

GOOD GOD!  If there is anyone left out there still thinking this is the White House we want, then that individual will never see the reality of our situation!  No, the President did not do this–it is the liberal mayors, however, it was this administration that started the ball rolling with the bowing and the scraping and the suck up to the East as well as to any other progressive agenda that undermines our Constitution and this Republic.  This cannot be allowed to continue in America.  What are we going to do about it?  How about volunteering to work for Conservative politicians running in the November election?  How about working very hard to dump Claire McCaskill.  Once, she actually told me that she votes her conscience, and I asked, “Aren’t you supposed to be voting the consciences of your constituents?”  There was no comment, but I didn’t really expect one.

Just Me

July 26, 2012 Posted by | Here And Now | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

   

Political Vel Craft

Veil Of Politics

Political Film Blog

money, power, injustice, sex, violence, propaganda, anti-fascism...

Constitutional Clayton

Politics surrounding the Constitution

mike884

Smile! You’re at the best WordPress.com site ever

John Groves Art Stuff

Art from johngrovesart

swissdefenceleague

Swiss Defence League

the seaton post

A little bit of this and a little bit of that

Jericho777's Blog

Correcting Misinformation!

The Firewall

Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it

%d bloggers like this: